Special Education
I am of two minds on this issue, like the author of this Acton Institute for the Study of Religion & Liberty commentary: There has to be a Better Way. In discussing the recent Supreme Court case, she writes:
Here is a "punny" look at the struggles of parents of special needs children, from Special Education Law Blog: Law and Disorders:
I am of two minds on this issue, like the author of this Acton Institute for the Study of Religion & Liberty commentary: There has to be a Better Way. In discussing the recent Supreme Court case, she writes:
I sympathize with both sides in this case. As a fiscal conservative, I understand the position of the Montgomery County School District. They are required by Federal law to provide individualized services for all disabled students. The Federal government provides some money to meet this requirement, but nowhere near the full cost. An Individualized Education Plan, or IEP, as required for disabled students, can be appealing to a smart parent with a difficult child. From the school’s perspective, every parent who pops up with a disabled kid is a net drain. If the Court had ruled that an "appropriate" education means whatever the parents say it means, the schools’ fiscal burden would be greatly increased.
At the same time, I sympathize with the parents. I am a veteran of many years worth of IEP’s, going back to 1991, with the arrival of my first child. In the years since, I have also had several foster children go through the IEP process. I admire the anonymous wag who wrote a bit of doggerel in the style of Dr. Seuss, "I do not like these I-E-Ps. I do not like them, Geez-louise. I do not like them here or there. I do not like them anywhere."
Here is a "punny" look at the struggles of parents of special needs children, from Special Education Law Blog: Law and Disorders:
<< Home